Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girls' Generation 'The Best Live' at Tokyo Dome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus saw nothing worth merging on this small page. Shii (tock) 11:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Girls' Generation 'The Best Live' at Tokyo Dome

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's a concert. There is nothing notable for it to have a separate Wikipedia article. WP:NTOUR TerryAlex (talk) 18:13, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a huge concert and it did go on the national news, its more than just a concert. — Preceding

unsigned comment added by 77.78.51.73 (talk) 07:12, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user is just speaking from a fan's point of view. This is a one-time concert. The article lacks coverage and it certainly has no notability to be on Wikipedia.--TerryAlex (talk) 07:20, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (commune) @ 20:40, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (notify) @ 20:41, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No obvious notability. --DAJF (talk) 01:28, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to a Girls' Generation related article, such as a list of tours, or to their discography section if that doesn't exist. Concerts are rarely notable and despite the huge attendance and venue (a kind of concert that some singers can only dream of), this is no exception, given that the coverage is has received is just reporting-type stuff. A merge however is a preferable alternative to deletion in this case, however, as long as a proper target exists. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 06:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NTOUR. One-off concert that does not appear to have generated any coverage in reliable sources. As for the merge suggestion--there is nothing to merge here; the article really contains nothing but notifications of announcements (no teasers this time?) and a set list; the only thing worth saving is the number of attendants, but that claim is not verified. Drmies (talk) 17:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The "number of attendants" has already been indicated within the group's main article (with sources). There is no point to merge/keep this article.--TerryAlex (talk) 19:19, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NTOUR. One brief mention in Korea media (any in Japanese media? it was held in Japan), plus three references to the artist's own sites (one via allkpop). There's nothing exceptional about this one-off concert that requires its own article, especially since this article contains no real information. Shinyang-i (talk) 02:52, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete could fit as a nice little paragraph on SNSD's main page Asdklf; (talk) 23:06, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - We don't know if the concert is notable enough to merit its own article yet. Maybe there could be a small blurb about the concert in the Girls' Generation article. Aerospeed (Talk) 15:50, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. First two google hits are wikipedia articles (that's always a bad sign). The rest of the first page of search results are a couple of Korean blogs, YouTube, and Tumblr. No objection to a merge and/or redirect if there was an appropriate target article. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.