Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gera (caste)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gera (caste)

Delete unsourced one-liner about a purported subcaste. No indication that this group is notable. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 19:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 19:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I suspect that all subcastes are notable, but I also see that there are no references on this article. --Eastmain (talk) 19:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not establish notability. No references. No other information. - KNM ^Talk 20:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-noteability. archanamiya · talk 20:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete This sort of article has the potential to be interesting, good and useful. However one sentence is pointless. Ijanderson977 (talk) 22:28, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - single-line substub with not even the slightest claim on notability. Stifle (talk) 18:22, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence of notability. ~ priyanath talk 03:50, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.