Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gareth neighbour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 20:08, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gareth neighbour

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable academician that fails WP:PROF. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 01:15, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 01:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Inother (talk) 03:08, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No good indication of notability. Agtx (talk) 04:32, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:47, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:48, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The achievements listed in the article (head of department and editor of a journal) fall short of the corresponding WP:PROF criteria (head of university or editor-in-chief of journal) and I also don't see enough in the citation record to justify a keep that way. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:28, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.