Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Games2win

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:21, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Games2win

Games2win (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, almost everything about them on the internet is essentially WP:PROMO or not a significant source. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:28, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:44, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:44, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• A bunch of announcements in the WP:VG/S custom search engine but nothing of significant coverage. My inclination is to delete, but the non-Western bent of the article gives me some slight pause. --Izno (talk) 12:18, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, fails WP:NCORP. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 21:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.