Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallene Sciences

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:06, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gallene Sciences

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:COMPANY. The sources are not independent enough for notability. The draft has been declined 3 times, but the creator moved it to mainspace anyway. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 04:58, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:46, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:46, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:46, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article itself isn't making much of a claim to notability -- it asserts little more than that it exists and that it sells certain products. I had trouble accessing the newsmada piece, but the others are press-release types of articles (and note that reference 6, from thehealthpilot, is merely a reprint of reference 4). In all, we have been given no reason to believe that this new company has achieved encyclopedic notability. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:17, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom: sources fail WP:RS, the only real edits are by a SPA and the page is little more than a business listing ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 12:55, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.