Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GTA Online: The Contract

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Music of Grand Theft Auto V#GTA Online: The Contract. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:05, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GTA Online: The Contract

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article simply lacks enough content or notability to justify a split from its parent article; it is covered in enough detail there, and I believe expansion is unlikely. (And if we're being pedantic, this was never technically released as an EP—just a series of singles at the same time, hence the phrasing "List of singles" in the Track listing.) – Rhain ☔ 10:23, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, Music, and Video games. – Rhain ☔ 10:23, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Music of Grand Theft Auto V per nom as an WP:ATD. That said, I do not see why this had to come to AfD as there is no argument given why it should be deleted and it is very obviously a pertinent search term. Per WP:ATD-M, AfD is not for merging. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:06, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Zxcvbnm: AfD is suitable per WP:ATD-R. – Rhain ☔ 11:16, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, fair, I will keep that in mind. I have also changed my !vote to "redirect". ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:22, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per nom. OceanHok (talk) 12:38, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Music of Grand Theft Auto V#GTA Online: The Contract per above. Not enough coverage to sustain a dedicated article and a dedicated section already exists on the topic. Redirection was the right move and unclear why it was reverted. czar 03:15, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Frankly, this title should redirect to Grand Theft Auto Online, not the music article. Neocorelight (Talk) 10:25, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Neocorelight, the music article has a dedicated section on the topic whereas the Online article does not. czar 04:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Czar, not a dedicated section but it does discussed in 2021 section. Neocorelight (Talk) 04:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And remember I am talking about the title, not the EP. Neocorelight (Talk) 04:09, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Music of Grand Theft Auto V#GTA Online: The Contract where the EP is discussed. Fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 00:25, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The title doesn't even indicate it's an EP. The update/DLC should be the primary topic. Neocorelight (Talk) 02:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Grand Theft Auto Online. Anyone can place a piped link to Music of Grand Theft Auto V within an appropriate paragraph to discuss the soundtrack issue, but GTA Online: The Contract itself should be an appropriate search term for the DLC content itself. Haleth (talk) 11:49, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There's a consensus to redirect the article, but there are 2 suggested target articles.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ASTIG️🙃 _{(ICE-T • ICE CUBE)} 12:00, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Music of Grand Theft Auto V#GTA Online: The Contract as the best possible fit for the content. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 16:00, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.