Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furvah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:20, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Furvah

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relatively very young singer, bogus claim that his songs gone hit, no reliable source found to show notability and coverage of his songs. Only self published blogs etc. Self promotional sites(Facebook and Twitter) are shown in External links, simply fails in both WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. A.Minkowiski^{_Lets t@lk} 16:50, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no indication of notability, unduly promotional, and the author has a history of writing promotional articles on subjects of dubious notability, likely as a paid editor. Huon (talk) 22:14, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom, obviously nn Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:10, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly not notable. Bordering on A7 speedy-deletable. --Michig (talk) 09:35, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough swag yet. Logical Cowboy (talk) 13:04, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: notability is not established. Fylbecatulous talk 16:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.