Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fugly

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 22:46, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fugly

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Sonic Mew July 5, 2005 19:21 (UTC)

Delete dicdef. Jaxl 5 July 2005 19:35 (UTC)
Delete slang dicdef. -Thepinterpause 5 July 2005 19:48 (UTC)
Delete slang dicdef. JamesBurns 6 July 2005 01:40 (UTC)
Delete, slang dicdef already on Wiktionary. --bainer (talk) 6 July 2005 05:27 (UTC)
Delete — it's already in wictionary. — RJH 6 July 2005 15:32 (UTC)

Comment from the submitter of the "Fugly" entry: Searching for define:fugly in Google lead to the empty entry in Wikipedia. I responded to the invitation, that such pages constitute, to create an entry for the next person. If Wikipedia is not a dictionary, then you need to change your relationship to Google, so that Wikipedia entries are not return for define: queries and perhaps Wictionary searches are performed instead.

"define:" searches aren't limited to dictionary definitions. One can search for, for example, "define:Gorge W. Bush". I say redirect to ugliness. -Sean Curtin July 9, 2005 01:54 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted by nine different admins. Non admin close. Whispe ring 11:51, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fugly

Lacks content, does not agree with WP policy, lacks notability, badly written, unsalvagable. Wikidudeman ^(talk) 10:39, 7 July 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete has already been deleted once, delete and salt. Darrenhusted 11:21, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.