Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flavour Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Monty ₈₄₅ 17:35, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flavour Magazine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about free magazine with no indication of notability and apparently no reliable references since 2008. I've looked at the first 10 pages of ghits and can't see any. (I've declined my own prod as it seems to have been prodded once before.) Peridon (talk) 17:56, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 18:13, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The previous prod appears to have been declined because the tagger was tagging other magazine articles after his was deleted at AfD. In this case, I feel he was correct and the prod should not have been declined. (His prods for Loaded and Nuts were fairly certainly not going to get anywhere...) Peridon (talk) 09:25, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not meet the general notability guideline. --Inother (talk) 17:55, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:12, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:55, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, does not meet WP:GNG, google search brings up nothing. article originally created by User talk:Flavourmag (now banned - spamblock) who appeared to be a wp:spa.Coolabahapple (talk) 12:51, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.