Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filthy Thievin' Bastards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. kingboyk 03:32, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Filthy Thievin' Bastards

The article is about a band, but fails to make any assertion of WP:MUSIC notability Cynical 21:57, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Listed in All Music Guide, has released two albums on a notable label, features members from several notable bands (even labelled by AMG as a super group). Punkmorten 22:35, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment WP:MUSIC says that otherwise non-notable 'side projects' of notable musicians should generally be written about on the page about the notable subject, with the sideproject being a redirect.

Right. Notable side projects, however, should get their own article. This appears to be a notable side project, so I say keep due to albums and membership. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 05:18, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• keep please notable enough in the all music guide Yuckfoo 00:21, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• keep as per above Jcuk
• keep even though I'm the nom - seems to be notable after all Cynical 10:53, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.