Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Far Horizon (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:26, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Far Horizon (video game)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreleased video game that does not seem to meet the notability criteria; no sources given to indicate notability or significance 331dot (talk) 15:38, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets as the dev also lacks coverage. Please ping me you find more (non-English and offline) sources. – czar 14:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. Can't find any reliable sources. The1337gamer (talk) 14:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not a notable game. AdrianGamer (talk) 14:39, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No coverage in reliable sources. Studio seems to exist, but no news source has reported on them or their project. I don't even see a press release anywhere. It looks like it's way too soon for an article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:41, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and possible speedy delete per A7 or G11. No claim to any significance, likely some sort of advertising. Pretty clearly non-notable. mikeman67 (talk) 21:41, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - appears to lack significance and reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. Perhaps it will meet the criteria when released, but I could be misleading myself with that assumption - WP:TOOSOON. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 22:00, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.