Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabulous (Ashley Tisdale song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge with High School Musical 2 (soundtrack) Nakon 16:10, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fabulous (Ashley Tisdale song)

HSMcruft Sceptre ^(talk) 14:33, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Per nom. archanamiya · talk 14:51, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Beloved Freak 15:38, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment per Wikipedia:Guide_to_deletion, "To avoid confusing newcomers, the reasons given for deletion should avoid Wikipedia-specific acronyms." a newcomer would have trouble knowing what it is we're trying to debate here. Beeblbrox (talk) 01:20, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Merge Delete per nom and move relevant information into the article on the movie.Insearchofintelligentlife (talk) 03:11, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the song is notable and I think there's plenty to say about it that could fill up an independent article. The movie and soundtrack have been reviewed many, many times, providing a lot of potential for content discussing the song and the scene in the movie in which the song is performed; furthermore, the song has charted. There's also probably some things that the actors and people involved in the production have said about it. However, the article should be titled "Fabulous (High School Musical 2 song)"; Tisdale sings it as a character in the movie, not as herself. Everyking (talk) 07:41, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable song from massively notable franchise. Stifle (talk) 14:37, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not really. Whore out a franchise enough and you can get every song from it in the iTunes top 100. Sceptre ^(talk) 14:49, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Will. Agree that this does not pass our notability standard. Eusebeus (talk) 15:33, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. And who is Will, Eusebus?Divinediscourse (talk) 20:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Me. Sceptre ^(talk) 20:21, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~keep~~ change to Merge Notability per WP:BAND is established by charting. The above argument for deletion seems to object to why the song charted as opposed to if it did. I would add the concerns I expressed above have still not been addressed. but in retrospect it would be better to Merge to the main article on the soundtrack per DHM Beeblbrox (talk) 22:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The song was charted = meets WP:N. Europe22 (talk) 01:54, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to album. Spending 1 week on a chart, at #74, is not a sure fire sign of something people will care about. Hence, not seeing actual notability (just seeing it meet parameters on a notability *guideline*). dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 10:52, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.