Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FF Vinyl Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:41, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FF Vinyl Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No stand alone notability. References do not back FF Vinyl Records notability. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:52, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:58, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:58, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:58, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning towards delete - I have to say, at first glance, it looked like the article had alot of references despite that now alot of them seem to be dead even with searching archive.org. Detailed Google News searches including "Cardiff UK, "record label" and some of their clients provided nothing until my last search here (event listing, not very promising). The Guardian, The Telegraph and Daily Mail provided nothing as well. As I've mentioned, getting a good article on a record label is challenging sometimes because the record label hides more in the shadows behind the client or (2) there are mainly PR pieces. It doesn't even seem there's a website but this is probably due to the fact they are now a management company which actually tends to get lesser attention than record labels. Additionally, it doesn't seem they have a website even as a management company (at least, I can't find it). Doesn't seem to be much add to this article therefore I lean towards delete. SwisterTwister talk 04:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- A defunct record company that publisher 36 records strikes me as NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:21, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.