Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Explara

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:33, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Explara

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A highly-promotional article on an unremarkable tech startup. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is routine announcements, WP:SPIP sourcing such as yourstory.com and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Judging by the talk page of the article's creator, the page was speedy deleted in Sept 2014, and then recreated by the same contributor in Dec 2014. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:17, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:17, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:33, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:33, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indications of notability, a run-of-the-mill company. Wikipedia is not a marketing or advertising platform nor an alternative to a corporate website. Fails WP:SPIP. Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:21, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Clarkcj12 (talk) 17:23, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:42, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not sure why this was relisted twice. The subject fails WP:NCORP, the sources fail WP:SPIP, and the article fails WP:NOTADVERTISING. Rentier (talk) 22:59, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.