Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exit Music (For a Film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to OK Computer. Of note is that the nominator also specified to redirect in a comment within the discussion. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:58, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Exit Music (For a Film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a poorly written article containing original research. More importantly, I don't believe the subject matter deserves its own article. The song "Exit Music (For a Film)" wasn't a single, doesn't have a music video, and has not received enough attention to merit notability on its own terms. The song can be sufficiently covered in the OK Computer article. Popcornduff (talk) 17:57, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or redirect to OK Computer. I believe that enough material may be found for a standalone article. Otherwise, the best would be its redirection to the main article, OK Computer. Deletion doesn't even seem to be necessary; a merge proposal would've been more appropriate. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 19:10, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I suck at this - redirecting is indeed what I had in mind, but when I redirected before, I was directed to the AfD process. Popcornduff (talk) 19:36, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re-direct to OK Computer. Doesn't seem independently notable from the album. Orser67 (talk) 22:28, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the album. Individually it isn't a notable track. KaisaL (talk) 01:01, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.