Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Europhoenix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted per CSD G5 RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:55, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europhoenix

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created by known SP. Non notable firm with history about purchases of locomotives but nothing notable. Nordic Nightfury 07:20, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 07:20, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 07:20, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 07:20, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane2007 ^talk 14:23, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete From the looks of it, AfD is not the place for this. An admin should be allowed to delete this guy's articles without individual consensus. 157.235.66.80 (talk) 22:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:25, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is eligible for speedy deletion, both G5 (created by Piccadilly389 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who is a sock of a blocked user) and A7. I have tagged it as such. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:31, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.