Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English Volunteer Force

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to English Defence League. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:05, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

English Volunteer Force

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Low quality sources and is not notable enough Pass a Method talk 12:35, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 12:56, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 12:56, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 12:56, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete On the face of it, this doesn't seem to meet WP:ORG. A minor far-right English splinter group supported by one local source. A redirect to English Defence League#Offshoots and divisions is possible. Funny ^Pika! 14:15, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:04, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge a brief summary to Funny's target. I have heard no reference to this on the news and presume it to be very small. Peterkingiron (talk) 10:44, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 11:48, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge I agree. I've not heard much in the way of news for this fascist organization to warrant it's own article. scope_creep (talk) 16:34, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.