Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emerging Crowd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Emerging Crowd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As the service has not begun, it is WP:TOOSOON. CSD WP:G11 removed by sock of author (now blocked.) ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 21:22, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If it is judged notable when it begins, then it's a Keep. Feb 2015 is only next month, after all. Jjamesryan (talk) 21:27, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep From the Huffington Post source, "Emerging Crowd, headquartered in London and under FCA regulation, is the first investment-based crowdfunding platform exclusively focused on frontier and emerging market companies." That sounds notable. Other sources support WP:GNG met. Gaff (talk) 22:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 21:39, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 21:39, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - a quick google search brings up plenty of sources. Many are in niche industry magazines and the like but there is plenty of coverage in national papers and other publications. St★lwart¹¹¹ 02:10, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.