Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward C. Dickinson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. no other conclusion seems possible DGG ( talk ) 23:56, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edward C. Dickinson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. No "significant coverage" and has no accomplishments apart from making a "field guide to the birds". Some random staff member at a museum. MayVenn (talk) 02:40, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 October 5. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 03:00, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:09, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:09, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:09, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not really true, he has published work of some influence, including taxonomic revisions, and has been on the ICZN, a fairly important position. I suggest this be procedurally closed, as the nominator has just been trying to prove a point, with no prejudice to immediate relisting. —innotata 19:15, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.