Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eden Ventures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:25, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eden Ventures

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete A run-of-the-mill VC company with no indications of notability in their own right. While they may have invested in several well-known firms, notability is not inherited and this article is little more than a platform to promote their services, failing WP:SPIP. None of the references are intellectually independent and fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:42, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:07, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:07, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:07, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no indication of notability. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 04:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, NCORP failure and no credible claims to significance.--SamHolt6 (talk) 21:33, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems inactive Misterpottery (talk) 10:03, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There seems to be a coordinated effort by HighKing to delete Venture Capital firms (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mangrove Capital Partners and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoxton Ventures, for other examples). Not much thought has gone into it - HighKing has just copied and pasted the same filler comment. This attempted mass-deletion seems to be an abuse of the AfD process, since it does not allow defenders time to respond adequately. I suggest that the closing admin close none of the AfDs for delete, due to the attempted abuse of process. -Mparrault (talk) 14:28, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.