Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eden Star

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:31, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eden Star

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found one review from a RS, one sponsored article from a RS, and one two-paragraph post from a RS about its release, but not enough independent sigcov. QuietCicada (talk) 14:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. QuietCicada (talk) 14:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are more sources left on the talk page. Not sure if those are enough. Timur9008 (talk) 17:40, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind. two of those are just videos. Timur9008 (talk) 14:48, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep There is also a PC Gamer preview here and some non-sponsored reception from PCGamesN here. It seems to have the bare minimum reception for a standalone page regardless of its vaporware status. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:00, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:43, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:37, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - RPS review, PC Gamer preview, and one of the PCGamesN articles ([1]) seem just enough to pass WP:GNG. --Mika1h (talk) 00:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.