Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eco Friendly Lord Ganesha Idols

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ganesh Chaturthi#Eco friendly Ganesh Idols. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:10, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eco Friendly Lord Ganesha Idols

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not sure if this deserves a separate article. More opinions needed. Anbu121 (talk me) 13:15, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Ganesh Chaturthi.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:24, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Anbu121 (talk me) 13:28, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Anbu121 (talk me) 13:28, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There's nothing to merge. Coverage at Ganesh Chaturthi#Environmental impact is plenty adequate. --BDD (talk) 17:49, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect after merging content with Ganesh Chaturthi. Secret of success (talk) 16:25, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You cannot "delete after merging", as that makes the merged content WP:COPYVIO. Merge and redirect is what you want, I think? - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 16:59, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Corrected. Secret of success (talk) 13:49, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 16:59, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Its an important issue which comes up many times during the festival. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] shows some signs of notability which is good enough to warrant an article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 12:27, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- How do you say that it warrants an article in this case? If it is related to the festival directly, it is better off in the festival's article. Secret of success (talk) 13:49, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - But given the amount of information available about it, and the current size of the main article, a article can be warranted. Do remember that we don't want the main article to go of-topic. Just a section and a {{main}} link to this article is just what it needs. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 16:10, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Right now, virtually everything in the article duplicates content in a section of the festival article. Better to build it up there and spin out the section if necessary. --BDD (talk) 16:21, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.