Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EBay API

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

EBay API

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. While eBay is obviously notable, it's not clear that its API is. The article itself is extremely support with little more than a feature list, and the only sources are eBay itself. I would suggest merging into eBay but its really not obvious what the notability of this is--lots of websites have APIs. TheRealOj32 (talk) 06:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG. As per nom, there are tons of APIs out there, and there's nothing showing this one is notable. Discant X 06:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Cleo Cooper (talk) 06:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Due to lack of WP:RS coverage. There are notable APIs like Google APIs.GobsPint (talk) 00:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To play devil's advocate (on my own AfD), every link on Google APIs is from Google, AKA only primary sources. Would you really consider that to follow WP:RS? TheRealOj32 (talk) 05:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.