Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dyslexia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Just no. April Fool's Day nominations are one thing, but the date isn't an excuse to make dyslexia jokes. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 15:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lyxdesia

Dyslexia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (Viwe lgo · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tish pega is ton helpful ni nay yaw. Ti seden to be defix. Net Puond Remmah • ^{(Waht did I wercs pu won?)} 01:03, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless you do not unscramble this text. (Detele slseun ouy od ont suncarbmel tish ettx.) Eyesnore 01:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Esepyd Eeldte rep mon. MidadonEirmn7^No_zEELHW!^{riapl lofos!}_DoPcrut9033 10:82, 1 lpAir 1720 (UCT)
• Edetle erp onm - 'Ntac drtdunsean a wrod fo het tcaleri. (Delete per nom - Can't understood a word of the article - Davey2010 )–Adyev1002^Kalt 14:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.