Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dude in Distress

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:03, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dude in Distress

Wikipedia is WP:NOT for neologisms. Finds a hit on Google Scholar and a few on Google Books, but only mentioned in passing. Article is headed toward WP:LISTcruft. shoy 01:19, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per Nom Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth :) 01:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per NomMbisanz 02:47, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Probably qualifies for speedy. Its not encyclopedic. - Rjd0060 02:54, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The article might not be encyclopedic, nor the title; but the subject certainly is. Much critical ink has been spilled on this topic: just ask a student of queer or women's studies. Ichormosquito 03:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Find some reliable sources that use the phrase and I'll withdraw my nom. A quick Google sweep didn't turn up anything for me. shoy 12:47, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If there's anything to merge into Damsel in distress, it might be worth doing, else just delete, possibly redirect as mentioned. humblefool ® 07:13, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per NEO. CRGreathouse (t | c) 13:31, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.