Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Mabuse's Kaleido-Scope

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. -Doc^g 00:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Mabuse's Kaleido-Scope

Contested prod: non-notable "academic media blog". Zetawoof^(ζ) 03:38, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Nashville Monkey 06:32, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A student blog. Claims to have been cited... by other blogs. the wub "?!" 11:06, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep disclaimer: article's author. No offense, but I'm having a hard time seeing how these users know what constitutes a "non-notable" blog in this field jsperb 07:25, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - It's a fair question; the guideline on notability can be found at WP:N. Generally, the guideline is not specific to any particular field. The key is whether there are non-trivial published works by multiple separate sources that are independent of the subject itself.--Kubigula (talk) 05:24, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the article currently stands. I am prepared to revisit if sources can be added.--Kubigula (talk) 05:24, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability can arise once the blog is getting recognition outside its own self-pollinating garden. This doesn't seem to be happening with this one yet. WMMartin 16:31, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.