Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donnalyn Bartolome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Only delete !vote is a WP:VAGUEWAVE without further explanation. Narutolovehinata5 mentioned coverage in reliable sources which was not disputed or further discussed. Rest of nominator's rationale is straight out of WP:ATA, mainly mentioning problems that can be fixed by editing. SoWhy 18:26, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Donnalyn Bartolome

Donnalyn Bartolome (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another BLP with no established notability as per WP:GNG, with little or no coverage around the web. I also notice that the article is in pretty bad shape, bordering either on WP:OR or WP:FANCRUFT, and WP:CITEIMDB, which are not good. Bluesphere 08:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:09, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep. On YouTube, she has about 240k subscribers and 32m views, which is a fair amount. Is there a policy for YouTubers on Wikipedia? In some respects, their notability exists only on YouTube. For example , I just picked one of her video's at random from a few weeks ago "Donnalyn Dance Cover" and its got about 153k views, 4k likes and 200 comments. She's probably got more support than some musicians listed on YouTube.Seaweed (talk) 13:13, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep @Seaweed: As far as I know, we don't have an internet personality notability guideline, and YouTube views and subscriber counts are not necessarily enough to establish notability; we have had articles on very popular YouTube personalities being deleted before due to lacking coverage in reliable sources. But in the case of this one, it appears she has been covered in reliable sources such as the Philippine Daily Inquirer ([1], [2]) and Rappler ([3]). She also appears to have been nominated for the MTV EMA awards as a wildcard; I'm not sure if such a nomination by itself is reliable given that apparently it was by public vote, but that's something, I guess. In any case, she does appear to be notable, not for being a popular YouTuber, but for passing the WP:GNG. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:58, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak DeleteWeak Keep per Seaweedfails GNG Chetsford (talk) 16:25, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.