Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donavon Warren

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 03:33, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Donavon Warren

Donavon Warren (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded without rationale. Fails WP:NACTOR, and searches did not turn up enough to show he passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 21:45, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:26, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete NACTOR and GNG. South Nashua (talk) 01:13, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete' The film mentioned has a tag that it may not meet notability guidelines. I think people need to figure a clear yes or no answer there as well.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:19, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Film is not notable, and it's the only claim to notability for this person. Even if the film WAS notable, I don't think he's notable just for this one project, and there's literally nothing else on him anywhere. Rockypedia (talk) 22:23, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - non-notable WP:NACTOR and WP:FILMMAKER.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Donavon_Warren&oldid=1137796180"