Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doko (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 17:15, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Doko (song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing in this article shows that this song is notable. TJRC (talk · contribs) insists that it is notable and reverts all efforts to redirect this to the album page, but no evidence has been presented of it being notable. In its present state, nothing is given that shows that this article meets WP:NSONGS guidelines for notability. Unless WP:RS can be found to show its notability, this should be redirected to the album page. either way (talk) 09:42, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Move the one sentence to the artists page. I don't understand how the "single" can have a track listing of 4 tracks, but don't see any album to redirect to per nom. North8000 (talk) 12:10, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Singles with four tracks - two songs along with an instrumental version of each - are common in Japan, and releases of this type are indeed called singles there. Typically the instrumental versions are simply the same song minus the lead vocal track and are intended for singing along to. Ibanez100 (talk) 01:26, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and merge what little is there with an appropriate album page, artist page, discography, or something. I also don't see anything here to prove this song notable per WP:NSONGS. Ibanez100 (talk) 01:26, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No in-depth coverage. Can be redirected to Hocus Pocus (Kaela Kimura album). --DAJF (talk) 00:05, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.