Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney Magical Dance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Any redirect is a separate editorial decision. Sandstein 19:52, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disney Magical Dance

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches simply found nothing to suggest improvement aside from this, for this sparsely edited article from August 2011 by a now blocked user. However, considering it had Japanese connections, I'm not sure if there's better Japanese coverage. There's also no target for moving elsewhere. Notifying tagger Sjones23. SwisterTwister talk 20:43, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:48, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per WP:N, WP:RS and WP:V. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 21:30, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 19:20, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Disney Magical Dance on Dream Stage so that the revisions are at the correct title, then redirect and add to list at List of Disney video games#Miscellaneous Disney games. This game exists and was released in Japanese Arcades in 2007, and is perfectly appropriate for a redirect to a list of Disney-licensed games as a plausible search term. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ —Preceding undated comment added 18:38, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, yes, a lack of references may spell delete. A pity, really, since the Making-Random-Disney-Characters-Dance-Together community is so neglected by pop culture at large. If only the mainstream media would take note of what really matters. Earflaps (talk) 01:22, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:00, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and above editors. Searches turned up nothing to show this passes WP:GNG. Or Redirect as per Salvidrim!. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:47, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.