Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Direct Care in the United Kingdom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 04:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Direct Care in the United Kingdom

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has no useful content. Platitudinous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rathfelder (talk • contribs)

Comment. Maybe a re-write better than a delete. There definitely does exist some sort of direct care somewhere in the UK. Jordanee155 (talk) 14:13, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment WP:ITEXISTS is not a valid reason to keep an article. The test is verifiable notability. --Ahecht (TALK
  PAGE) 15:35, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 March 27. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 00:01, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No references, no reason to believe it's notable. After reading the article, I'm still not sure what it is. Profession? Business? The practice of taking care of people? Greedo 8 17:18, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Essentially a dictionary definition for a concept. No refs. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:25, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Appears a neologism and original research (WP:NOR) by a one day editor. Why wasn't the author notified? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmokeyJoe (talk • contribs) 07:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.