Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Tinoco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR applies. ✗plicit 12:37, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Diego Tinoco

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously nominated for deletion in 2018 and nothing has changed since that nomination, which closed as 'delete'. That nomination read: "It feels too soon. Role in a netflix original, without much else. None of the listed sources are reliable as far as I can tell. Article departs no real information." and I can only add that he still, with no more notable roles than last time, continues to fail WP:GNG; WP:NACTOR. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:27, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, and United States of America. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:27, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It might have been a case of WP:TOOSOON in 2018 given the subject only had one significant role at that time, but with the role in the film, R#J, there is now enough to get over WP:NACTOR. In terms of WP:GNG, the article contains a couple of Deadline sources, and there are some Hollywood Reporter sources (here and here) which could be added to the article, and which, in combination, demonstrate WP:SIGCOV. I agree that the article's creator was certainly on the front foot here, but I don't actually think this is an instance of WP:TOOSOON—not anymore, anyway. Dflaw4 (talk) 12:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:46, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:47, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.