Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhyanyogi Omdasji

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 12:48, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dhyanyogi Omdasji

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Based on the content of the article, the subject does not appear to meet notability criteria. At the moment this article is sourced only to self-published and/or otherwise unreliable sources, and I'm finding nothing in terms of reliable sources about him. Also a very convoluted article whose writing style is more like a "fan page" for the guru than an encyclopedia article. Kinu ^t/_c 18:35, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why wasn't this prodded first? Xxanthippe (talk) 02:18, 14 April 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Dhyanyogi Omdasji has got his sound meditation patented.. it has been patented by United States Copyright Office (Divine Omdasji Sound Meditation - SR0000398348 dated 2006-09-13) can this be termed as a reliable source ? Also Dhyanyogi Omdasji has been accredited with

certificate of honor given by the board of supervisors of the city and county of san francisco
proclamation from mayor of san franscisco
and has various journals published on sound meditation

--Saint watcher (talk) 13:09, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't any evidence that the subject of this article meets notability criteria for inclusion. Peacock (talk) 19:26, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't the accolades won by the guru mean anything here as a proof? --Saint watcher (talk) 15:47, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.