Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dagur clan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dagur clan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Part of the Jat clans category. Not a notable topic. Just a couple lines with two references, clan is not worth an article, fails WP:GNG. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG Spiderone 21:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I guess, it's hard to check for sources since there are lots of spellings of this and there are definitely sources for Dogar, which appears to be a caste. If we delete this we should delete Dagar as well. Anyway as far as I can tell in 1904 the Dagar had only 2,065 people, unless their numbers have increased they are unlikely to be notable. All the mentions I can find are just lists of clans with no significant coverage. There is always the possibility, though, of offline or foreign-language sources. --Cerebellum (talk) 16:59, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not demonstrate notability by WP:GNG. A quick Google search in English brings up few, if any, relevant results; scarce information in Hindi as well. Mélencron (talk) 06:21, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~A similar AFD regarding Dagar was closed as no consensus. As an aside, Dagur clan is almost a complete duplication of Dagar. Primefac (talk) 19:22, 23 January 2017 (UTC)~~ Dagar has been converted to a DAB. Primefac (talk) 22:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Dagar is a perfectly valid disambiguation page, as one can see in this revision of it. But Primefac is hell-bent to get it deleted. I am still trying to engage them in discussion, as you can see at Talk:Dagar. But they are just interested in edit-warring. - NitinMlk (talk) 19:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NitinMlk, if you read through that AFD you'll find that I rescinded my !vote and have made no claims (either here or there) about the suitability of this topic for inclusion on Wikipedia. Kindly do not put words in my mouth or misrepresent my actions. Primefac (talk) 19:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are repetitively converting Dagar into a clan article without proving the notability of the clan. As I expained to you at Talk:Dagar, either prove that the clan is the primary topic or just self-revert your this edit. Thanks - NitinMlk (talk) 19:49, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you even understand disambiguation or consensus? Closing editor of this AfD must see the shocking edits at Dagar by Primefac. They changed it from this version to this one, without developing consensus. Please also see Talk:Dagar & Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dagar. - NitinMlk (talk) 22:17, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NitinMlk, you really need to calm down. You got what you wanted, so stop bitching. Primefac (talk) 22:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I know that whatever you did was in good faith. And I apologize for hurting your emotions. - NitinMlk (talk) 22:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.