Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. Shina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

D. Shina

D. Shina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apart from being quoted in some news reports, I can’t find anything which directly discusses the subject. The main claim for notability is that the subject is an “expert in Electricity Finance”, but could not find any scholarly articles attributed to her, let alone the citations. Fails WP:PROF. Salih (talk) 18:52, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Her studies and analysis after the budget were well noticed for the last four years. they are among the very few observations on the impact of the union budget. In Kerala there is nobody else who works on Electricity finance other than Dr M. Sarngadharan apart from Dr Shina. The citations also shows that even KSEB takes important decisions like withdrawal of load shedding base on her studies. 59.93.10.118 (talk) 06:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - She does not meet WP:PROF. Her work with Kerala electricity board in itself is not enough to satisfy our notability criteria for academics. --Sodabottle (talk) 05:15, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.