Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cue (Film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 00:14, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cue (Film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There does not seem to be any outside reference to the article that builds the notability of the subject. Furthermore, the neutrality of the article can be can be contested. Learncontribute (talk) 22:15, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable per WP:GNG as I could not find independent coverage for this topic. It appears that Alana Jenkins is James Postlethwaite's agent, as evidenced here, so this article's creation goes against WP:COI. It may be worth evaluating the article James Postlethwaite (Director) for notability as well. I found this but nothing further. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 21:30, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Erik lays it out mighty convincingly. --ceradon (talk • contribs) 08:43, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can find no reliable sources for this film. Erik's analysis appears very accurate. --I am One of Many (talk) 10:49, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.