Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crazy Frog Racer 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus against deletion. – czar 19:13, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crazy Frog Racer 2

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG --☣Anar chyte☣ 08:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As written, fails Wikipedia:Notability (video games). Ping me if more soruces are found. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:33, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus, ping – czar 03:51, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not even close to being notable. Kage Acheron (talk) 00:08, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep/Redirect – Has 5 reviews on Metacritic, an IGN review not listed on metacritic. And some coverage on other sites: [1], [2], [3]. Maybe not enough to make a decent separate article but redirecting to Crazy Frog Racer or Crazy Frog seems fine. --The1337gamer (talk) 10:03, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per the sources found by The1337gamer. This nominations seems like a failure of WP:BEFORE. As Metacritic shows, the subject was even featured in hard copy, print Magazines, not to mention the ones easily found online, like IGN. I'm honestly not sure what's worse, the sloppy effort gone into writing this article, or the research done in seeing if it should be nominated for deletion. We do have to keep in mind that we should not mistake the former as an excuse for the latter... Sergecross73 msg me 14:31, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's not World of Warcraft, but it's got a few reviews in reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:50, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:48, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - As much as I hate the little shit the game does unfortunately have a few sources, Sure they're not brilliant but meh I'd say they're sufficient enough. –Davey2010^Talk 01:17, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.