Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connexion.org

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 December 14.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seresin | wasn't he just...? 05:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Connexion.org

WP:Notability. May be notable, however, I can't find anything on the web which would suggest notability via independent reviews other than blogs and the like. Pgagnon999 (talk) 21:34, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep The site does appear to be notable and has had some coverage in LGBT publications, but it hasn't been covered in the mainstream press as extensively as other social networking sites such as Myspace or Facebook. Dgf32 (talk) 21:45, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note I'd reverse if those sources are put forward and are shown to be significant within that community. --Pgagnon999 (talk) 21:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments on Connexion.org. Whether that page is significant probably depends on whether you regard the activities of Tim Gill (which would be me) to be significant. I'm still adding citations and such. And since this is the first page I've ever done it's going slowly. For all I know, I'm not sending this message properly either. Nottim (talk) 22:15, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Tim, although you may be notable, with regard to Wikipedia, notability is not inherited. The software must be notable in of itself. Also note (you seem like a nice enough contributer, so don't take this the wrong way) it might be worthwhile to read WP:Conflict of interest. --Pgagnon999 (talk) 23:51, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 15:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - not notable. Just an ad for yet another social networking site. Bardcom (talk) 19:28, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. – ukexpat (talk) 19:56, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.