Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collision Films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Chris Hopewell. Per the redirection, the article's Revision history remains accessible, in the event anyone wants to perform some selective merging of content. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:50, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Collision Films

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about an animation studio with no sources that satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. Even the source used in the article doesn't name the actual company. Could possibly be redirected into Chris Hopewell, but does not meet WP:GNG for a standalone page. CNMall41 (talk) 20:59, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. samee converse 21:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. samee converse 21:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. samee converse 21:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Chris Hopewell makes a lot of sense. Notable projects but coverage isn't there apart from bits and pieces. Best covered in leader's article, which is stubby at the moment. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or redirect Seraphim System ^(talk) 08:17, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:07, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Chris Hopewell; not independently notable. I don't see any usable sources worth merging, so a redirect is preferred. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:24, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.