Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colasanti's Tropical Gardens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure) Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:49, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Colasanti's Tropical Gardens

Colasanti's Tropical Gardens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not convinced this has the coverage to meet WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 14:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep A quick newspapers.com search brought up a lot of coverage on the gardens and their owner, mostly from the Windsor-Detroit area. It's clearly locally notable. The article itself needs some work and may be too promotional (hence the word weak before the word keep), but there should be enough out there to pass GNG/WP:NCORP. SportingFlyer T·C 19:14, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep due to it being a frequently cited local tourist attraction and as such meeting GNG (see the link I provided upon deproding this for proof); additionally a check should have been made against the academic literature as to the academic use of the living collections. Conservatories typically supply plant samples for research that requires it (such as for DNA analysis).--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 23:05, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per above. The article is in need of large-scale cleanup, but this isn't in TNT territory. JavaHurricane 09:07, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdraw nomination per all comments above. Thanks, everyone. Boleyn (talk) 16:23, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.