Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Club Sonderauflage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (NAC) RMHED (talk) 23:08, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Club Sonderauflage

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable bootleg. Cannibaloki 01:26, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:50, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. An apparently authorised version was released in 2006. http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=22328 http://www.auralexploits.com/product_3190.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by Contains Mild Peril (talk • contribs) 03:29, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently? Authorised by whom? These non-reliable sources only shows another bootleged version released in 2006.--Cannibaloki 14:06, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon sells it so I'm guessing it's legit. The Italian record label Earmark seems to specialise in re-issues. Contains Mild Peril (talk) 15:05, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read WP:NALBUMS? A bootleg is notable, if it have significant independent coverage in reliable sources.--Cannibaloki 15:39, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is true, the Grey Album is a known bootleg album off the top of my head. --Cleave and Smite, Delete and Tear! (talk) 14:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Bootleg release sold on Amazon and the subject is... somewhat notable. --Cleave and Smite, Delete and Tear! (talk) 14:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The Grey Album is a notable bootleg because it received significant independent coverage in reliable sources (i.e. professional reviews). A bootleg sold by Amazon does not mean that is a notable album.--Cannibaloki 22:49, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. May have been a bootleg at one point but is actually an unofficial recording. The album has been released on Earmark records in 2006 and is listed on allmusic and VH1, both are reliable sources. J04n(talk page) 02:59, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.