Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloudreach

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:59, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cloudreach

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inadequately-sourced article about a non-notable company. The only available sources are affiliate listings, trivial listings, press releases and one mere mention found in Information Age. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. - Mr X 13:37, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. - Mr X 13:38, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. - Mr X 13:38, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom; fails WP:ORGDEPTH. Article started by WP:SPA. Likely WP:SELFPROMOTION. NickCT (talk) 14:37, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:29, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete couldn't find any 3rd party information that would make this company notable. Only press releases and marketing. Chosenone Pie (talk) 05:18, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -There are few independent coverage but they mostly are short/passing mentions and do not help subject to reach the WP:CORPDEPTH standard. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 23:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.