Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clive Emsley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep - nominator withdrew. (non-admin closure) StAnselm (talk) 22:14, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clive Emsley

Clive Emsley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability for 5 years; couldn't establish notability Boleyn (talk) 17:45, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 15. Snotbot  t • c »  17:58, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I have added various references to the article. The one that I think is of most relevance here is the 2009 "Laudatio for Professor Clive Emsley": "one of the foremost exponents of criminal justice history. (...) intellectual leadership (...) unique role in developing the field of criminal justice history research worldwide (...) all groundbreaking, and many still standard works in the field". AllyD (talk) 20:59, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 10:49, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 10:49, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 10:49, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 10:49, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 10:49, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. One of the foremost British experts on criminal and policing history. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:01, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Spedy Keep. Notable as author, at least. Reviews in Guardian, Telegraph and History Today]. Extensively cited. Mcewan (talk) 11:46, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per the above. The sources brought forward by Mcewan would be sufficient on their own. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 17:16, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw nomination Thanks to AllyD for the improvements, and to all who commented. Boleyn (talk) 22:06, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.