Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claims of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Claims of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:QUOTEFARM with only unreliable sources. There are many prophets that have made a number of claims that are debated but there is no Claims of Jesus, Claims of Muhammad. Subject is already covered on Mirza_Ghulam_Ahmad#His_claim that's why article is redundant. Orientls (talk) 10:46, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 November 20. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:59, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:40, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:40, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete anything of substance can be discussed ibn the article on Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:12, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- This is a classic case of a fork. It fails even to contain a sufficient lead to provide context. There may be a case for a small amount of material to be merged back to the main bio-article, prior to deletion. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:37, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unnecessary forking, nothing more. PepperBeast (talk) 04:43, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.