Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circle of Magic (Doyle and Macdonald novels)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:47, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Circle of Magic (Doyle and Macdonald novels)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I read these books as a kid, and even enjoyed them; but I can't find any substantive secondary sources about them. In addition to the usual search engines, I also looked through ISFDB, which, while not reliable in itself, often links to reliable sources. These books, as far as I can see, aren't even listed there. I frequently write about speculative fiction, so I'd be surprised if I've overlooked anything, but I'm happy to be proven wrong. Delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 22:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:08, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:08, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:14, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. I couldn't find any reviews, so it seems a failure of NBOOK, but ping me if reviews are found and I'll revise my vote. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:44, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.