Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chikayo Nakano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:35, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chikayo Nakano

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor with one supporting role in Madlax. VADB does not show any entries. Can someone look into this and check whether she is notable? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:10, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:10, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:11, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:11, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Google Japan search comes up with no good sources, from the lack of hits this is an easy decision. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 22:14, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, delete. When I originally created the article, I kinda thought she'd have more notable roles, but ten years later, she seems to have left the industry with no impact. --Koveras ^☭ 07:02, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - ANN only lists one lone role, and 81 Produce does not have her listed on their website (at least not anymore). As the final nail in the coffin, she doesn't even have a Japanese Wikipedia page, which is surprising considering it tends to have articles even on stuff that wouldn't be considered notable here. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:59, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.