Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chihayafuru Part 3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. czar 05:24, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chihayafuru Part 3

Chihayafuru Part 3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON. The only notability for unreleased films comes from significant media attention, something which this has not elicited in major publications. DrStrauss talk 17:12, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:40, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:41, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Please refer to WP:NFF: for unreleased films, the issue is not just the degree of media attention, but whether the commencement of principal photography can be confirmed by reliable sources. Given that this is a very popular series in Japan, there are already a number of articles, including in major papers like the Mainichi, that confirm the commencement of principal photography: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], etc. The first previews have even been released: [10]. Michitaro (talk) 11:22, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per meeting WP:NFF. Simple. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 16:42, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.