Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chester Toy and Doll Museum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chester Toy and Doll Museum

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP: ORG, closed now Happyecheveria (talk) 03:16, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries and Toys. Happyecheveria (talk) 03:16, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: closure is not a reason for deletion under WP:ORG. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:43, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree closure is not grounds for deletion. Book sources almost certainly exist but I'm no longer in Cheshire so can't go to the library to find them. I've notified WP:WikiProject Cheshire in case someone there can help. Espresso Addict (talk) 13:50, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:58, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Seeking a little more participation here. We just have the nominator's view and comments that the deletion rationale is not justified.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:36, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG. nothing in gnews and just directory listings in gbooks. LibStar (talk) 23:49, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.