Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chadar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) – Uanfala 10:15, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chadar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. This appears to be a variant of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chadhar but not a recreation. The latter was deleted some time ago. Sitush (talk) 12:08, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NB: Chadar, spelled as per this article's title (but not its body text) can refer to a type of shawl and a form of marriage for widows. The only sources for it being a clan are unreliable etc and we do not usually have a disambig page when there are just two possibilities, ie: the putative Chadar (shawl) and Chadar (ceremony) articles. Nor, as a rule, do we mention non-notable caste-related subjects in disambig pages because they just create a shedload of problems. - Sitush (talk) 12:17, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, we already have Chadar trek, so the potential for a valid disambig page (3 or more articles about notable subjects) does exist. - Sitush (talk) 12:22, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes a disambiguation is a possibility here. Capitals00 (talk) 06:14, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And there's also "Chadar" an alternative spelling of Chador. – Uanfala 07:53, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:32, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:32, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll create a disambig page. This nomination can be considered withdrawn. - Sitush (talk) 07:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.