Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Johnson (YouTuber)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 22:14, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chad Johnson (YouTuber)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All references are primary sources. No indication of coverage in reliable, third-party sources to establish notability. I've done a search online for such coverage and have come up empty. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 20:45, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Can't see any notability sources, most of the links are primarily targetting social media. I cannot verify the reliability of the said article based on the reference fielded.--Prince Sulaiman ^{Talk to me} 20:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable. Gparyani (talk) 21:00, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable OluwaCurtis The King : talk to me 21:09, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Added other sources, including Gigaom, ABC World News Now, Zagat/Google, iMore, Bleeding Cool, Premiere Radio Networks, etc User:Sircheeto talk to me 1:32, 12 August 2015 (UTC) User:Sircheeto is the creator of this article. Disclosure added per WP:AFDFORMAT.

Question: Do you have sources that talk about him? Many sources (ABC included) seem to be links to videos/podcasts with him, but I'm not seeing sources that talk about him in any kind of depth, that are also unrelated. That's really what will be needed here. Crow^Caw 16:36, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:42, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:42, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Can't see any reliable sources, most of the links are targetting social media, some cyclic, fails GNG.Pincrete (talk) 16:31, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now as there's nothing much convincing yet. SwisterTwister talk 04:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Bazj (talk) 09:37, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.